1985 Caterham 1700 vs. 1991 Mazda 626
To start off, 1991 Mazda 626 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1985 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Caterham 1700 | 1991 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Caterham | Mazda |
Model | 1700 | 626 |
Year Released | 1985 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2520 mm |