1985 Caterham 1700 vs. 1992 Ford Probe
To start off, 1992 Ford Probe is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Probe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Probe weights approximately 734 kg more than 1985 Caterham 1700.
Because 1985 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Probe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Caterham 1700 | 1992 Ford Probe | |
| Make | Caterham | Ford |
| Model | 1700 | Probe |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.3 mm | 84.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77.6 mm | 74 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Top Speed | 179 km/hour | 227 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 543 kg | 1277 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2620 mm |
