1985 Caterham 1700 vs. 1992 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1992 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 1,692 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Caterham 1700 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Toyota Lite Ace weights approximately 557 kg more than 1985 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Caterham 1700 | 1992 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | Caterham | Toyota |
| Model | 1700 | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1992 |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 543 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1910 mm |
