1985 Caterham 1700 vs. 2005 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2005 Isuzu KB is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,998 cc, 2005 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Caterham 1700 (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2005 Isuzu KB. (129 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 2005 Isuzu KB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Isuzu KB weights approximately 1357 kg more than 1985 Caterham 1700.
Because 2005 Isuzu KB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Isuzu KB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Isuzu KB (265 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Caterham 1700. (165 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2005 Isuzu KB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Caterham 1700.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Caterham 1700 | 2005 Isuzu KB | |
Make | Caterham | Isuzu |
Model | 1700 | KB |
Year Released | 1985 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2998 cc |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 265 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.3 mm | 95.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.6 mm | 104.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 18.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 543 kg | 1900 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 3030 mm |