1985 Caterham 1700 vs. 2007 Holden Epica
To start off, 2007 Holden Epica is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1985 Caterham 1700. (135 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1985 Caterham 1700.
Because 1985 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Caterham 1700. (165 Nm). This means 2007 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Caterham 1700.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Caterham 1700 | 2007 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Caterham | Holden |
| Model | 1700 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2700 mm |
