1985 Caterham 1700 vs. 2009 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2009 Dodge Dakota is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Dakota (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1985 Caterham 1700. (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1985 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Dakota (236 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Caterham 1700. (165 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Caterham 1700.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Caterham 1700 | 2009 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Caterham | Dodge |
Model | 1700 | Dakota |
Year Released | 1985 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1692 cc | 3701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.3 mm | 87.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.6 mm | 100 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 3340 mm |