1985 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1946 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1946 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1946 Volvo PV 60.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Chevrolet Camaro | 1946 Volvo PV 60 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Camaro | PV 60 |
Year Released | 1985 | 1946 |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2850 mm |