1985 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1958 Volvo 120
To start off, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1958 Volvo 120. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1958 Volvo 120.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Volvo 120. (115 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1985 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Chevrolet Camaro | 1958 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Camaro | 120 |
Year Released | 1985 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1582 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2610 mm |