1985 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1978 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,833 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1978 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1985 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Chevrolet Camaro | 1978 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1985 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2833 cc | 2290 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 223 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2480 mm |