1985 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1978 Renault Siete
To start off, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Renault Siete. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Renault Siete would be higher. At 2,833 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1978 Renault Siete. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1978 Renault Siete.
Because 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Renault Siete, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Renault Siete. (72 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1985 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Renault Siete.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Chevrolet Camaro | 1978 Renault Siete | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Camaro | Siete |
Year Released | 1985 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2833 cc | 1037 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 223 Nm | 72 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2540 mm |