1985 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1980 Seat 131
To start off, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Seat 131. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Seat 131 would be higher. At 2,833 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1980 Seat 131. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1980 Seat 131.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Seat 131. (94 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1985 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Seat 131.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Chevrolet Camaro | 1980 Seat 131 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
| Model | Camaro | 131 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2833 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 223 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2500 mm |
