1985 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1994 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1994 Ford Aerostar is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 133 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Aerostar. (217 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1985 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Chevrolet Camaro | 1994 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Camaro | Aerostar |
Year Released | 1985 | 1994 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2833 cc | 2978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 223 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3030 mm |