1985 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1996 Ford Ka
To start off, 1996 Ford Ka is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,833 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1996 Ford Ka. (58 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Ka.
Because 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Ka. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1985 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Chevrolet Camaro | 1996 Ford Ka | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Camaro | Ka |
Year Released | 1985 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2833 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 58 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 223 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2450 mm |