1985 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1996 Suzuki Baleno
To start off, 1996 Suzuki Baleno is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,833 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (119 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1996 Suzuki Baleno.
Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (153 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1985 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Suzuki Baleno.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Chevrolet Camaro | 1996 Suzuki Baleno | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
| Model | Camaro | Baleno |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2833 cc | 1839 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 223 Nm | 153 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 83 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2490 mm |
