1985 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1998 Acura EL
To start off, 1998 Acura EL is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,833 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1998 Acura EL. (127 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1998 Acura EL.
Because 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Acura EL. (145 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1985 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Acura EL.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Chevrolet Camaro | 1998 Acura EL | |
Make | Chevrolet | Acura |
Model | Camaro | EL |
Year Released | 1985 | 1998 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2833 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 223 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4478 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1704 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2619 mm |