1985 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1998 Panoz Q9
To start off, 1998 Panoz Q9 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Panoz Q9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Panoz Q9 (678 Nm) has 455 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. (223 Nm). This means 1998 Panoz Q9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Chevrolet Camaro | 1998 Panoz Q9 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Panoz |
| Model | Camaro | Q9 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2833 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 223 Nm | 678 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2650 mm |
