1985 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1998 Rover 200

To start off, 1998 Rover 200 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,833 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover 200 (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1985 Chevrolet Camaro.

Because 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 200. (185 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1985 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 200.

Compare all specifications:

1985 Chevrolet Camaro 1998 Rover 200
Make Chevrolet Rover
Model Camaro 200
Year Released 1985 1998
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2833 cc 1994 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 133 HP 140 HP
Engine RPM 5100 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 223 Nm 185 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 88.9 mm 84.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76.2 mm 89 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4280 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1690 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2510 mm