1985 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2002 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2002 Renault Kangoo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,833 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2002 Renault Kangoo. (97 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Kangoo.
Because 2002 Renault Kangoo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Kangoo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Kangoo. (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1985 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Kangoo.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Chevrolet Camaro | 2002 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Camaro | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1985 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2833 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 223 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 80.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2630 mm |