1985 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2004 Mazda B4000
To start off, 2004 Mazda B4000 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,029 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda B4000 (207 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B4000 should accelerate faster than 1985 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2004 Mazda B4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda B4000 (323 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. (223 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda B4000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Chevrolet Camaro | 2004 Mazda B4000 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Camaro | B4000 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2833 cc | 4029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 223 Nm | 323 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 100 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3200 mm |
