1985 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2004 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2004 Renault Scenic is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,833 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2004 Renault Scenic. (74 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Scenic.
Because 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Scenic. (105 Nm). This means 1985 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Chevrolet Camaro | 2004 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Camaro | Scenic |
Year Released | 1985 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2833 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 223 Nm | 105 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2750 mm |