1985 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2005 Samsung SM3
To start off, 2005 Samsung SM3 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,833 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2005 Samsung SM3. (94 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2005 Samsung SM3.
Because 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Samsung SM3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Samsung SM3. (135 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1985 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Samsung SM3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Chevrolet Camaro | 2005 Samsung SM3 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Samsung |
| Model | Camaro | SM3 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2833 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 223 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2540 mm |
