1985 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2006 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2006 Smart ForFour is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,833 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP) has 70 more horse power than 2006 Smart ForFour. (63 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2006 Smart ForFour.
Because 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Smart ForFour. (92 Nm). This means 1985 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Smart ForFour.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Chevrolet Camaro | 2006 Smart ForFour | |
Make | Chevrolet | Smart |
Model | Camaro | ForFour |
Year Released | 1985 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2833 cc | 1099 cc |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 63 HP |
Torque | 223 Nm | 92 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 84.8 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2510 mm |