1985 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2011 Audi RS3
To start off, 2011 Audi RS3 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2011 Audi RS3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 246 more horse power than 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 1985 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2011 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi RS3 (450 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2011 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Chevrolet Camaro | 2011 Audi RS3 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Audi |
| Model | Camaro | RS3 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 335 HP |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
