1985 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2011 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2011 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,833 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2011 Volkswagen Polo. (59 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2011 Volkswagen Polo.

Because 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Volkswagen Polo. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1985 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Volkswagen Polo.

Compare all specifications:

1985 Chevrolet Camaro 2011 Volkswagen Polo
Make Chevrolet Volkswagen
Model Camaro Polo
Year Released 1985 2011
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2833 cc 1200 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 133 HP 59 HP
Engine RPM 5100 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 223 Nm 108 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 3970 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1682 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2470 mm