1985 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,833 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2011 Volvo C30. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2011 Volvo C30.
Because 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo C30 (270 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. (223 Nm). This means 2011 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Chevrolet Camaro | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Camaro | C30 |
Year Released | 1985 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2833 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 223 Nm | 270 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2639 mm |