1985 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC60 (321 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1985 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2013 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo XC60 (480 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Chevrolet Camaro | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Camaro | XC60 |
Year Released | 1985 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2833 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 321 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 223 Nm | 480 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4627 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1891 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2774 mm |