1985 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 1969 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1985 Chevrolet Caprice is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 5,001 cc (8 cylinders), 1985 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 795 kg more than 1969 Mazda Cosmo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chevrolet Caprice (346 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 1985 Chevrolet Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Chevrolet Caprice | 1969 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Caprice | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5001 cc | 1962 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 93 HP |
| Torque | 346 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1735 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2210 mm |
