1985 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2002 Suzuki F1

To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 5,001 cc (8 cylinders), 1985 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 265 kg more than 2002 Suzuki F1.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chevrolet Caprice (346 Nm) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 1985 Chevrolet Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.

Compare all specifications:

1985 Chevrolet Caprice 2002 Suzuki F1
Make Chevrolet Suzuki
Model Caprice F1
Year Released 1985 2002
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 5001 cc 1995 cc
Horse Power 0 HP 67 HP
Torque 346 Nm 106 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Vehicle Weight 1735 kg 1470 kg
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2210 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]