1985 Chevrolet Celebrity vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chevrolet Celebrity. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chevrolet Celebrity would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 313 kg more than 1985 Chevrolet Celebrity.
Because 2003 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Chevrolet Celebrity, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Chevrolet Celebrity | 2003 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Chevrolet | Cadillac |
Model | Celebrity | CTS |
Year Released | 1985 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2471 cc | 3563 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 252 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 1675 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2890 mm |