1985 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2002 Chrysler Concorde
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 133 kg more than 1985 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Because 1985 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2002 Chrysler Concorde | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
| Model | Monte Carlo | Concorde |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 3517 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 252 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1613 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2880 mm |
