1985 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2013 Mazda 6
To start off, 2013 Mazda 6 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 6 weights approximately 19 kg more than 1985 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Because 1985 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2013 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Monte Carlo | 6 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 2489 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1499 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2790 mm |
