1985 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Smart |
| Model | Monte Carlo | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 1867 mm |
