1985 Chrysler Laser vs. 1976 Lamborghini Urraco
To start off, 1985 Chrysler Laser is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Lamborghini Urraco. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Lamborghini Urraco would be higher. At 2,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Lamborghini Urraco is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Lamborghini Urraco (260 HP) has 160 more horse power than 1985 Chrysler Laser. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Lamborghini Urraco should accelerate faster than 1985 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Lamborghini Urraco weights approximately 75 kg more than 1985 Chrysler Laser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Lamborghini Urraco is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Lamborghini Urraco. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Chrysler Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Lamborghini Urraco (273 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Chrysler Laser. (179 Nm). This means 1976 Lamborghini Urraco will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Chrysler Laser | 1976 Lamborghini Urraco | |
Make | Chrysler | Lamborghini |
Model | Laser | Urraco |
Year Released | 1985 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 260 HP |
Torque | 179 Nm | 273 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104 mm | 64.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 10.1:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1300 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2550 mm |