1985 Chrysler Laser vs. 1999 Toyota MR-S
To start off, 1999 Toyota MR-S is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Toyota MR-S (140 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1985 Chrysler Laser. (100 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Toyota MR-S should accelerate faster than 1985 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Chrysler Laser weights approximately 255 kg more than 1999 Toyota MR-S.
Because 1999 Toyota MR-S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Toyota MR-S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Chrysler Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chrysler Laser (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Toyota MR-S. (176 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1985 Chrysler Laser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Toyota MR-S.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Chrysler Laser | 1999 Toyota MR-S | |
| Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
| Model | Laser | MR-S |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 104 mm | 91.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1230 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2610 mm |
