1985 Chrysler Laser vs. 2000 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XK is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1985 Chrysler Laser. (100 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1985 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XK weights approximately 345 kg more than 1985 Chrysler Laser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Chrysler Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XK (393 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Chrysler Laser. (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2000 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Chrysler Laser | 2000 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
Model | Laser | XK |
Year Released | 1985 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 3996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 290 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 393 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 10.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3040 mm |