1985 Chrysler Laser vs. 2000 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2000 SsangYong Musso is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 SsangYong Musso (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1985 Chrysler Laser. (100 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Musso should accelerate faster than 1985 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 605 kg more than 1985 Chrysler Laser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Chrysler Laser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 SsangYong Musso (307 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Chrysler Laser. (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2000 SsangYong Musso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Chrysler Laser | 2000 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Chrysler | SsangYong |
Model | Laser | Musso |
Year Released | 1985 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 307 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 90.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104 mm | 88.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 10.4:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1740 mm |