1985 Chrysler Laser vs. 2003 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2003 Smart Roadster is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Smart Roadster (100 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1985 Chrysler Laser. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Smart Roadster should accelerate faster than 1985 Chrysler Laser.
Because 2003 Smart Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Smart Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Chrysler Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chrysler Laser (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Smart Roadster. (130 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1985 Chrysler Laser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Smart Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Chrysler Laser | 2003 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Chrysler | Smart |
Model | Laser | Roadster |
Year Released | 1985 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2370 mm |