1985 Chrysler Laser vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 3,835 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (225 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1985 Chrysler Laser. (100 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor should accelerate faster than 1985 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor weights approximately 625 kg more than 1985 Chrysler Laser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Chrysler Laser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (339 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Chrysler Laser. (179 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Chrysler Laser | 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor | |
Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
Model | Laser | Endeavor |
Year Released | 1985 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 3835 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 339 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2630 mm |