1985 Chrysler Laser vs. 2004 Suzuki Liana
To start off, 2004 Suzuki Liana is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Suzuki Liana (104 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1985 Chrysler Laser. (100 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Suzuki Liana should accelerate faster than 1985 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Suzuki Liana weights approximately 15 kg more than 1985 Chrysler Laser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Suzuki Liana is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Chrysler Laser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Suzuki Liana will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chrysler Laser (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki Liana. (144 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1985 Chrysler Laser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki Liana.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Chrysler Laser | 2004 Suzuki Liana | |
| Make | Chrysler | Suzuki |
| Model | Laser | Liana |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1585 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 104 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1240 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2490 mm |
