1985 Chrysler Laser vs. 2008 Isuzu I-290
To start off, 2008 Isuzu I-290 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Isuzu I-290 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Isuzu I-290 (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1985 Chrysler Laser. (100 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu I-290 should accelerate faster than 1985 Chrysler Laser.
Because 2008 Isuzu I-290 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Isuzu I-290. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Chrysler Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Isuzu I-290 (258 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Chrysler Laser. (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2008 Isuzu I-290 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Chrysler Laser | 2008 Isuzu I-290 | |
Make | Chrysler | Isuzu |
Model | Laser | I-290 |
Year Released | 1985 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 258 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3210 mm |