1985 Chrysler Laser vs. 2010 Acura RDX
To start off, 2010 Acura RDX is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Acura RDX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Acura RDX (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1985 Chrysler Laser. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Acura RDX should accelerate faster than 1985 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Acura RDX weights approximately 563 kg more than 1985 Chrysler Laser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Acura RDX (352 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Chrysler Laser. (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Acura RDX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Chrysler Laser | 2010 Acura RDX | |
Make | Chrysler | Acura |
Model | Laser | RDX |
Year Released | 1985 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 352 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1698 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4636 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1869 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1654 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2649 mm |