1985 Chrysler Laser vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 6 (153 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1985 Chrysler Laser. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1985 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 6 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1985 Chrysler Laser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 6 (193 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Chrysler Laser. (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Chrysler Laser | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Laser | 6 |
Year Released | 1985 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 193 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4755 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1795 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2789 mm |