1985 Chrysler Laser vs. 2011 Holden UTE
To start off, 2011 Holden UTE is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 257 more horse power than 1985 Chrysler Laser. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1985 Chrysler Laser.
Because 2011 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Chrysler Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 351 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Chrysler Laser. (179 Nm). This means 2011 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Chrysler Laser | 2011 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Chrysler | Holden |
| Model | Laser | UTE |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
