1985 Chrysler Laser vs. 2011 Toyota iQ
To start off, 2011 Toyota iQ is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Chrysler Laser (100 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2011 Toyota iQ. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Chrysler Laser should accelerate faster than 2011 Toyota iQ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Chrysler Laser weights approximately 365 kg more than 2011 Toyota iQ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chrysler Laser (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Toyota iQ. (98 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1985 Chrysler Laser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Toyota iQ.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Chrysler Laser | 2011 Toyota iQ | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Laser | iQ |
Year Released | 1985 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 98 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3051 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2000 mm |