1985 Chrysler Laser vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Chrysler Laser (100 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2012 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1985 Chrysler Laser should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Chrysler Laser weights approximately 50 kg more than 2012 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Renault Clio (200 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Chrysler Laser. (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2012 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Chrysler Laser | 2012 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Chrysler | Renault |
| Model | Laser | Clio |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1460 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 104 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 17.9:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2580 mm |
