1985 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1980 Volvo 265
To start off, 1985 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 2,315 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 265 weights approximately 320 kg more than 1985 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1980 Volvo 265 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 265. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Chrysler Le Baron | 1980 Volvo 265 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Le Baron | 265 |
Year Released | 1985 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2315 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 82 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2660 mm |