1985 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 485 kg more than 1985 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Chrysler Le Baron | 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Le Baron | CLK |
Year Released | 1985 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 167 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2720 mm |