1985 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2004 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 505 kg more than 1985 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2004 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Chrysler Le Baron | 2004 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Chrysler | Lincoln |
Model | Le Baron | LS |
Year Released | 1985 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 229 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1685 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2780 mm |