1985 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2006 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2006 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Land Rover LR3 weights approximately 1281 kg more than 1985 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2006 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Chrysler Le Baron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Chrysler Le Baron | 2006 Land Rover LR3 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
| Model | Le Baron | LR3 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 4392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 300 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 2461 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2890 mm |
