1985 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 598 kg more than 1985 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2012 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Chrysler Le Baron | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Chrysler | Cadillac |
| Model | Le Baron | CTS |
| Year Released | 1985 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 318 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1778 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4877 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1842 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2880 mm |
